This blog is not intended to be the “what ought to be” or “what must be”. It should be seen as my little contribution to generating insights and igniting discussions on pertinent areas in drug policy in Africa. Africa needs right-centered approach to tackling drugs problems.
Friday, 3 April 2020
Wednesday, 1 January 2020
SETTING THE RECORDS STRAIGHT: RESPONSE TO CSOS CALLING FOR CRIMINALIZATION OF DRUG USE IN GHANA.
We have read the
CSOs petition to the President and the Speaker of parliament on why Ghana
should not legalize cannabis.
First and
foremost, we want to emphatically state, the current narcotics bill before
parliament is not seeking to legalize drugs, the bill before parliament is
seeking to decriminalize drug use and place the health and well-being of its
citizens at the forefront of its constitutional mandate by treating drug use as
a health issue.
Ghana is a
signatory to the 3 international conventions, that is 1961, 1971 and 1988
convention and the preamble-of these conventions mandate all member states to
place the health and well-being of its citizens in the implementation of these
conventions. Fairly, is continuous punishment of people who use drugs a
fulfillment of that commitment of Ghana? Absolutely no, it’s in clear violation
of the letter and spirit of these very conventions.
The Conventions
provide a very clear provision whereby drug use does not need to be
criminalized. The 1961 Convention, Article 36 (b) explicitly states “when
abusers of drugs have committed such offenses, the Parties may provide, either
as an alternative to conviction or punishment or in addition to conviction or
punishment, that such individuals shall undergo measures of treatment,
education, after-care, rehabilitation and social reintegration in conformity…”.
This is then
repeated in the 1971 Convention (Article 22b) and the 1988 Convention (Article
3, Para 4 c and d). Please take note of a commentary on the 1988 Convention “It
will be noted that, as with the 1961 and 1971 Conventions, paragraph 2 does not
require drug consumption as such to be established as a punishable offense”
(UN, 1988). Moreover, the term personal use has not been defined in the
International drug Conventions (Marks, 2019). The International Conventions
rather criminalizes possession with the intention of trafficking and not
possession for personal use.
We should not forget that, imposing on this very population with criminal records for
the use of cannabis or any other drugs have ripple effects, this very population
gradually become the fulcrum of any country's economy so why burden them with
criminal records for the rest of their lives for committing just minor non-violent drug offenses?
The UNGASS
Outcome Document, accordingly, calls on countries to “Encourage the
development, adoption, and implementation, with due regard for national,
constitutional, legal and administrative systems, of alternative or additional
measures with regard to conviction or punishment in cases of an appropriate
nature, in accordance with the three international drug control conventions and
taking into account, as appropriate, relevant United Nations standards and
rules, such as the United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for Noncustodial
Measures (the Tokyo Rules)” (Paragraph 4j).
Crucially, in
the 2019 Ministerial Declaration, all governments also “reiterate our resolve,
in the framework of existing policy documents… to promote, consistent with the
three international drug control conventions and domestic law, and in
accordance with national, constitutional, legal and administrative systems,
alternative or additional measures with regard to conviction or punishment in
cases of an appropriate nature”.
The new Cross-UN
Common Position goes even further and “commit[s] to stepping up our joint
efforts and supporting each other… To promote alternatives to conviction and
punishment in appropriate cases, including the decriminalization of drug
possession for personal use, and to promote the principle of proportionality,
to address prison overcrowding and over-incarceration by people accused of drug
crimes…
It is with
sadness how some CSOs in this country try to use these very instruments to
misinterpret the true meaning to Ghanaians.
The World Health Organization recommends an allowable amount of cannabis for therapeutic
purposes, about 0.3% THC content and should not be criminalized.
Ghana in effect
can allow an amount of 0.3% of cannabis use which according to WHO is not
harmful to the human being but strictly for medicinal purposes.
The WHO has
further requested the CND Commission on Narcotics Drugs) to reschedule
cannabis, why? Because cannabis has medicinal values that are beneficial to
humans hence should not be completely banned. (Cannabis is currently a Schedule
1 drug meaning it does not have any medicinal purpose which is not true).
Additionally, the American Academy of Arts and Sciences (2017) has confirmed
the medicinal value of cannabis.
It has been
reported recently that, there is conclusive evidence that cannabis is a drug
and it is effective in the treatment of chronic pain, multiple
sclerosis-related muscle spasms and chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.
Regarding the link between cannabis and cancer, the Academy found evidence to the effect
that, smoking cannabis does not increase the risk of cancer which is often
associated with tobacco use such as lung, head and neck cancers. The United
Nations human rights mechanisms also recognize that ensuring access to
essential medicines is an essential element of the right to health and by
ensuring the availability of essential medicines will help to achieve Target
3.b “…provide access to affordable essential medicines…”
Moreover, it is
reported that there is a large burden of untreated pain around the world with
as many as 80% of the world’s population without access to controlled medicines
(UNODC, 2018).
What some of these
CSOs in Ghana are doing is just throwing dust into the eyes of Ghanaians and
making everyone believe Ghana will be doing the wrong thing if we decriminalize
cannabis and treat drug use as a health issue as well as allowing a certain amount for medicinal purposes like in other countries.
We humbly ask
parliament to first and foremost think about the health and wellbeing of people
who use drugs and support them and not continue to jail them for their drug use
habits.
And Secondly,
Parliament has a duty to legislate laws that ensures that people who need
cannabis for medicinal purpose readily have access to it to help relieve
themselves of severe pain. We cannot continue to criminalize a substance that
can relieve pain when we actually have what it takes as a country to embrace
that. We will like to urge parliament to also consider declassifying Hemp which
is non-psychoactive and allow its growth for industrial and medical purposes. It is worth noting that the Government of
Ghana and Ghana as a whole will be in line to benefit from the generation of
taxes over the same period of some $10 million dollars, and that is just one
farmer.
Lastly, we will
like to draw parliament’s attention to the recent media alert by the INCB in
June (2019), where they admonished countries for over-reliance on prohibition
of drug use as the means of drug control. In actual fact, the INCB called on
countries to institute alternatives to punishment.
Coming home to
Africa, the Africa Union (AU) plan of action on drug control 2019-2024 that was
recently adopted by ministers of Member States has called on all to ensure,
that, drug control mechanisms are comprehensive and, evidence-based. The AU
further called on all member states to remove criminal sanctions against people
who use drugs and put in place alternatives to punishment for all who use drugs
whilst also putting in place as well as adopt and implement harm reduction
services for people who use drugs.
These and many
other International and regional commitments are things issues Ghana as a country we should be promoting in the current bill and not seeking to digress
from them.
We will like to
assure all well-meaning Ghanaians that, the debate before parliament is meant
to place the health and well- being of its citizens as a matter of priority and
not seeking to exacerbate the current problems.
In conclusion,
the WHO has recommended that “drug control should not be approached as an objective in itself but as a tool to optimize public health”. We will want to
join our voices to the following international organizations;
• The Committee on Economic, Social
and Cultural Rights
• Special Rapporteurs on the right to
health; on freedom from torture and other ill-treatment; and on extrajudicial,
summary or arbitrary executions;
• The Committee on the Rights of the
Child; and
• The Office of the United Nations
High Commissioner for Human Rights
in recommending the decriminalization of drug
use and possession for personal use which will be an important step towards the
fulfillment of the rights to health and towards protecting the safety and the well-being of communities.
This is in line
with the twelve UN agencies which have jointly recommended review and repealing
of laws criminalizing drug use and the possession of drugs for personal use on
27th of June, 2017. (UNAIDS/UNHCR/UNICEF/WFP/UNDP/UNFPA/UNWomen/ILO/UNESCO/WHO/IOM/OHCHR,)
Consequently, we
are only reinforcing the recommendations of all the above committees and
agencies. It cannot be the case that all these committees and agencies have
ulterior motives.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)