Showing posts with label alternatives to incarceration. Show all posts
Showing posts with label alternatives to incarceration. Show all posts

Sunday, 12 July 2026

World Drug Day 2026: Why Our Policy Responses Need a Reality Check

On June 26, 2026, the national observance of the International Day Against Drug Abuse and Illicit Trafficking brought together high-level stakeholders, including the chief of staff to the Narcotics Control Commission (NACOC), the Ministry of Education, the Interior Minister, chiefs, and religious leaders. The theme, “The World Drug Problem: Persistent Challenges, New Threats, and Innovative Responses", was timely.


However, as we reflect on the speeches and data presented, a stark disconnect emerges between our official rhetoric and the evidence-based realities on the ground. While the Chief of Staff and the UN Secretary-General spoke of a balanced approach, the policy directives from the Ministry of Education and the enforcement focus of NACOC suggest we are still doubling down on an outdated, punitive playbook. The Awareness Paradox: Why "Don't Start It, to leave in regret" Isn't Enough


The most illuminating moment of the day came during the research presentation by the UPSA and NACOC. The findings were clear: 95% of young people in the sampled districts are already aware of the harmful effects of drugs.


If 95% of our youth already know the risks, why are we still investing in slogans like "DON’T START IT, TO LEAVE IN REGRET" as our primary intervention?


The data confirmed that awareness is not the problem; the problem is behavioural change, access to support, and the crushing weight of peer pressure. We are treating a knowledge gap that does not exist while neglecting the behavioural health crisis that does. The Failure of Zero Tolerance


The most alarming development was the Minister of Education's call for zero tolerance in schools, with dismissal as a primary disciplinary measure.


From a harm reduction perspective, this is a regressive step. Expelling a student found with substances does not remove their dependency; it removes them from the only structured support system, the school, that can effectively intervene. It pushes vulnerable youth further into the margins, increasing their exposure to criminal networks and destroying their future prospects.


Ghana’s Narcotics Control Commission Act, 2020 (Act 1019), was designed to move us toward a public health model. Dismissing students is counter to this progress. A Way Forward: Evidence-Based Solutions


We must pivot from a model of enforcement and exclusion to one of identification and support. Here is my proposal for the way forward:


For the Ministry of Education (MoE) & GES:

  1. The ministry should replace expulsion with referral protocols. Instead of disciplinary committees, schools must establish referral and support protocols. When a student is identified as struggling with substance use, the trigger should be a mandatory assessment by a trained school counsellor or addiction health professional, not an exit interview.

  2. We need to integrate peer-refusal training. We have the data to show that 43% of substance initiation is driven by peer influence. Our assembly time should be used for life skills training, teaching students how to resist peer pressure rather than just repeating slogans.

  3. We need to create support hubs. Every district must have a designated mental health support hub accessible to students, ensuring that those in need can access clinical care without being severed from their education, and we also need to ensure that these environments are stigma-free.

For the Narcotics Control Commission (NACOC):

  1. NACOC needs data-driven hotspot interventions. The study confirms that substance use is highly concentrated (e.g., Madina at 73.5%). NACOC’s resources should be disproportionately allocated to these hotspots, not just for enforcement but for community-led outreach and the establishment of local drop-in centres (DICs).

  2. They need to invest in rehabilitation, not just scanners. While modern detection technology is vital for traffickers, it does nothing for the 85% of individuals who relapse. We need to shift a significant percentage of the budget from security-only tech to subsidising rehabilitation beds in our public health system.

  3. They also need to foster community integration. Use traditional leaders and religious institutions, as discussed during the event, not just to preach against drugs but also to serve as mechanisms for the reintegration of individuals in recovery.

The reality is that we cannot continue to treat a health crisis with criminal justice tools. As James Ebo White so eloquently reminded us, we are in a position where we must choose whether to "build for" our communities or "come for" our addicts.


The bill for our current policies in lost potential, broken families, and strained social systems is coming due. It is time for our policymakers to stop looking at the drug problem through a lens of moral failure and start viewing it through a lens of human development.


Let us honour the potential of our youth not with speeches, but with systems of support that actually work.


Thursday, 17 November 2016

The New ECOWAS Action Plan on the Drug Problem in West Africa



Experts and ministers on drugs from the 15 ECOWAS countries met in Abuja, Nigeria on 5th September as part of an on-going effort to address the drug problem and organised crime within the region. The meeting sought to appraise and review the implementation of the current ECOWAS “Regional Action Plan on Illicit Drug Trafficking, Organised Crime and Drug Abuse within West Africa”, and to approve its successor.
Governments within the sub-region have always made efforts to address the drug problem through the adoption of various methods and strategies over the years. ECOWAS initially put in place, adopted and endorsed its Political Declaration and Regional Action Plan on drugs for 2008 to 2011, which was then extended until 2015.
Prior to the ministerial meeting, experts on the subject matter – as well as stakeholders from member states, the African Union (AU), the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), INTERPOL and the European Union (EU) – deliberated on strategies to address the drug problem in West Africa, and to agree a new Regional Action Plan for 2016-2021.
The new Action Plan has seen some improvements in terms of the strategies to be adopted by Governments of the sub-region in addressing the global drug problem. For example, it specifically targets high and middle-level drug offenders, while offering alternatives to incarceration for people who use drugs – including treatment, rehabilitation and reintegration services where needed.
ECOWAS continues to demonstrate a strong commitment to addressing the drug problem in the region by facilitating the availability of a wide range of evidence-based treatment options, including opioid substitution therapy. The Action Plan also calls for harm reduction services to be made available, which is a great step taken by ECOWAS. It also includes a commitment to review and collate drug policies across the region.
In addition, ECOWAS has set up the West African Epidemiology Network on Drug Use (WENDU) for the collection and collation of epidemiological data at the regional and national levels. The Network is present in all 15 ECOWAS members states and includes a focus on drug treatment demand indicators and aggregate data on drug supply to inform policies.
The key role of civil society in the fight against drugs cannot be downplayed, not least because civil society organisations often offer services for marginalised groups that most governments are unable to provide themselves. The Action Plan recognises this, and clearly calls for strong partnerships with civil society as well as continued work with the West Africa Commission on Drugs.
In as much as ECOWAS is to be commended for these efforts and positive steps taken, there is still the need to address key issues like the need for decriminalisation (which is distinct from legalisation), proportionality in our sentencing, and government support for proven harm reduction services. These need to be strong calls made by ECOWAS, as people continue to be punished, marginalised and tormented through inhumane criminal justice responses, with lives being ruined just for the possession of small amounts of a drug. 
One other issue that has not been given enough attention in the ECOWAS Action Plan is needed to protect the basic human rights of people who use drugs. Everyone has the right to life, to health and to freedom from persecution: it is no different when it comes to people who use drugs. Yet in most West African countries, these people are considered violent and a threat to society, and are denied access to quality healthcare facilities. ECOWAS needs to urgently address the lack of quality health services available for people who use drugs, and work to make them accessible.
Finally, West African governments should also be providing alternative livelihoods for people who engage in cannabis cultivation in the region. Even though the ECOWAS Action Plan seeks to create employment avenues for people who grow cannabis as a source of livelihood, the on-going criminalisation of subsistent farmers needs to be critically reviewed.